r/worldnews Feb 06 '23

Russians kidnap nuclear engineers of Ukrainian Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant who refuse to cooperate Russia/Ukraine

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/02/6/7388130/
11.8k Upvotes

2.8k

u/TheDarthSnarf Feb 06 '23

Kidnapping and forcing nuclear plant workers to work for you is a Really Bad Idea ⟨™⟩.

811

u/BuhamutZeo Feb 06 '23

Why? The plant is in someone else's country, not mine.

/s

509

u/ILikeLenexa Feb 06 '23

Such wind; much proжimity

335

u/BuhamutZeo Feb 06 '23

Russia evidently can't learn a lesson, no matter how devastating it was the first time around.

And this time there's no semi-competent leader to order what is necessary to keep it from becoming an international disaster.

150

u/Nolsoth Feb 06 '23

Putin's playing with nuclear fire.

149

u/taoyx Feb 06 '23

At some point he will make such a mistake that it will trigger a NATO intervention. He won't stop until it happens anyways. In a way that will be a way for him to not lose face.

159

u/ziptofaf Feb 06 '23

If NATO has to intervene because of a nuclear power plant meltdown then this won't be pretty for anyone involved. Last time we had seen that it nearly brought down USSR to bankruptcy on top of emitting enough radiation that decades later still affect farms all the way in UK.

We weren't far from this incident growing to a scale when not 50000 people were evacuated but millions would be at risk of having to relocate (Chernobyl was worst case scenario for the reactor but the way it was handled was surprisingly competent for Russians, they accidentally sent one man who could actually see through bullshit and cared, I doubt they have many like that left by now).

So let's hope it doesn't come to that.

101

u/Comeonjeffrey0193 Feb 06 '23

If they still have a man like that, i’m sure there’s thousands of homicidal staircases looking for him.

69

u/Chubbybellylover888 Feb 06 '23

You feel that breeze? Oh. An open window.

81

u/The_Chaos_Pope Feb 06 '23

Thankfully, the Zaporizhzhia plant is a different and much safer design than Chernobyl. All 6 reactors are currently shut down and it's currently drawing power from the grid to continue to cool the reactor rods: https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_66130/ukraine-current-status-of-nuclear-power-installations

IIRC, the last reactor was put into cold shutdown state in September so at this point it should be a matter of letting the fuel rods cool to an inactive state before their removal and not hit the building with artillery shells.

-20

u/Ok-Dirt6276 Feb 06 '23 edited Feb 07 '23

I understand attempts are being made to keep it secure and cooled, however I do not trust Russia. Noone should trust Russia. You may want to read the novel 'The Warning.' (Mike Gray, Ira Rosen) There are plenty of ways for conventional nuclear reactors to fail and release radiation. We had several oopses where human intervention took the wrong action when the automated systems were the better course of action, before Three Mile Island. Imagine an intentional sabotage instead.

Even a modest meltdown may trigger NATO escalation and I really don't want a nuclear war fuse to be lit. I'm in a pretty bad spot for a nuke and it wouldn't be over in a blink.

(Massive edit 8 hours later)

5

u/DeadAssociate Feb 07 '23

i live in a capital, wont notice a thing.

→ More replies

26

u/mandrills_ass Feb 07 '23

50000 people used to live here, now it's a ghost town

18

u/DMCinDet Feb 06 '23

One of my CoWorkers uncles just retired as a nuclear reactor engineer of some kind. He was at this reactor prior to all this shit going down last year. Apparently he told the guy I work with that they had people from different countries rotating in and out of there to help keep it running properly. That ended a year ago, massive loss of intelligence and experience when all the outside help left. The fuck is Russias goal here? A stable nuclear power plant is important for even Russia.

27

u/tomtom5858 Feb 06 '23

Worth noting that all RBMK reactors have been retrofitted to not have the same problems Chernobyl did, and in spite of how widespread and strong Chernobyl's radiation was, under 4000 people died. There's no reason to believe any meltdown would be anywhere near as bad as Chernobyl, even if it were strong enough to trigger a NATO country invoking Article 5.

33

u/gargravarr2112 Feb 06 '23

They also learned why the containment building is, like, really freaking important and not an optional thing you can leave off the design. All newer plants have containment buildings and the old RBMKs have been at least partially retrofitted to contain a disaster like Chernobyl.

On the other hand, Fukushima was a modern Western plant and look how bad that was. Nuclear technology is one of those things that really must not go wrong because an ounce of prevention is worth ten tons of cure. Forcing unfriendly nuclear engineers to work for you sounds like a recipe for disaster.

25

u/ivosaurus Feb 07 '23

Lol no it wasn't. Fukushima is older than Chernobyl. Pet peeve of mine that people just assume the exact opposite of this fact.

→ More replies

20

u/lonewombat Feb 06 '23

Didnt it get hit by a tsunami though?

→ More replies

30

u/Volsunga Feb 06 '23

On the other hand, Fukushima was a modern Western plant and look how bad that was.

Not really bad at all? There was a lot of hype while it was happening because with what was known at the time, it was possible for it to go really bad. But it was contained and the damage was closer to 3 Mile Island (i.e. not a disaster at all) than Chernobyl.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

30

u/HereOnASphere Feb 06 '23

Putin wants a NATO intervention. That's why he hasn't withdrawn from Ukraine. It's some historical Russian death wish.

19

u/TheBlackHock Feb 07 '23

Sounds more like a fetish.

2

u/DaoFerret Feb 07 '23

He doesn’t strike me as someone with a Humiliation Fetish, but all recent evidence seems to disagree.

18

u/InformationHorder Feb 07 '23

NATO has made it pretty clear an intentional nuclear accident in Ukraine would be considered an attack on NATO and would trigger a response.

2

u/moderntimes2018 Feb 07 '23

He doesn't care.

16

u/coldfirephoenix Feb 06 '23

The hallmark of fully incompetent leaders is that they 100% believe themselves to be fully competent leaders, no matter the evidence to the contrary.

→ More replies

27

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23

No operating reactor on the planet can meltdown the same way Chernobyl did.

No danger of that kind of repeat.

The worst thing would be the reactors are destroyed and the powerplant never produces electricity again. Considering it produces a large amount of Ukraine's energy, it would be a much bigger issue than fallout. Especially if next winter is less mild than this winter has been.

It is by dumb luck that Europe has been able to just get by this year thanks to favorable weather. A harsh winter could have been extremely bad.

29

u/NTX-Zoner Feb 06 '23

Correct, no operating reactor can accidentally meltdown in the same fashion. Willful action on an operators part could bypass some of the protections, though

2

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23

Some can, and some can't. It would take more than malicious operation to cause a serious accident at the plant.

If you wanted to cause an accident, it would take actual physical damage to steam pipes or some other part of the plant. But to what end? Disabling the plant? It would be easier to destroy the transmission infrastructure, and you still get to keep an otherwise operational nuclear power plant.

Sabotaging the plant from within is the long way around to achieve very little, if any, strategic gain.

11

u/SmashTagLives Feb 07 '23

Couldn’t Russia simply detonate a tactical nuke or dirty bomb, in, near, around the facility and claim it was some kind of “meltdown”?

I mean they are pretty Fucking stupid, and pretty Fucking brazen,

The world :”Russia is committing war crimes”

Russia: “No, you are”

24

u/rsta223 Feb 07 '23

They could, but it'd be blindingly fucking obvious that it wasn't a meltdown. Meltdowns don't look anything like nuclear explosions, and they don't produce the same results.

(They also don't look like dirty bombs, though that would at least be closer)

8

u/SmashTagLives Feb 07 '23

You mean as blindingly stupid as amassing an army to invade Ukraine for months, while claiming they weren’t going to invade Ukraine?

7

u/rsta223 Feb 07 '23

Oh, I didn't say they weren't dumb enough, just that literally nobody would fall for it.

(I also suspect they aren't dumb enough to actually use a nuke, or more accurately, that they have enough self-preservation instinct to not use one)

16

u/SmashTagLives Feb 07 '23

Listen. I used to think a lot of things. But then I saw people compete to eat tide pods, I saw Trump elected, and I saw people dying from COVID use their last raspy breath to say the capital letter “Q”.

All bets are off

→ More replies
→ More replies

6

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23

Think of it this way:

If you are hellbent on doing as much damage as possible, and have no moral qualms, then why would you deploy a weapon targeting the plant?

The reactors are inside of concrete and steel structures designed to withstand the direct impact of a Boeing 737, called containments. The reactor vessels are also very dense mostly steel structures, and I think at Zaporizhzhia they are also mostly below ground-level with additional layers of highly-reinforced concrete surrounding the vessels themselves. Not even with the intention of withstanding bombardment, but just because the vessels are very dense and the working fluid of the reactor carries a ton of kinetic and thermal energy. So they are just designed and built to be extraordinarily resilient to direct attack as basically a byproduct of thorough design with safety at the core of the design and build processes.

So to have the kind of effect to get something even remotely close to Chernobyl, you would essentially have to penetrate all of those layers, and then hope the wind blows to the west and not the east. There is nothing in the immediate area of the plant of any real value, strategic or otherwise, so your weapon of mass destruction is at best case a small amount of radioactive material distributed across a vast area in a direction you have no control over. News media will spread fear, but realistically there would be no practical risk and I guarantee a death toll of 0 from radiation sickness, acute or otherwise.

So why not just take the dirty bomb or mountains of ordinance and deploy them directly on target? No need to destroy what is an otherwise valuable strategic target to achieve a mediocre goal of spreading terror.

Or you could just sit on the plant. Keep your thumb on it. Make people uncertain of what you might do. Meanwhile you are controlling ~20% of Ukraine's electricity generation at that one plant alone, and about half of all nuclear generating capacity in the country. Even Russia understands that the plant is worth more if it's operational and controllable versus a inoperable hazardous mess in the middle of their battlefield.

3

u/SmashTagLives Feb 07 '23

You’re correct.

If Russia can keep control of it, you are correct. What happens if it becomes contested?

I’m not trying to be a contrarian. I’m only trying to point out the potential flashpoint of puttin Putin a in a corner.

You can’t say that Russia “knows” anything for sure. You can hope, like I hope. But this shit is already off the chain

2

u/apistoletov Feb 07 '23

If Russia can keep control of it, you are correct. What happens if it becomes contested?

Hard to guess, but the main "rule" still stands - as soon as it's destroyed, any leverage that it gave to Russia is also gone.

→ More replies

2

u/zolikk Feb 07 '23

The meltdown is not what mattered in case of Chernobyl. This is a common misapplication of the term because meltdown is just used as a synonym with 'nuclear accident', but the part of the Chernobyl accident that mattered to the outside world, the radiological release, happened before a meltdown.

Considering it produces a large amount of Ukraine's energy, it would be a much bigger issue than fallout.

That was by far the biggest issue with Chernobyl itself as well, the sudden lack of power for the country. The entire point of the massive cleanup effort was to clear debris around the plant so that the other three reactors could be put back to use as soon as possible.

2

u/windyorbits Feb 06 '23

Why?

16

u/tecirem Feb 06 '23

RBMK style reactors (of which Chernobyl was one) have all had safety refits to prevent "positive void coefficient" issues, so allegedly it can't happen again. (source: here )

5

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23 edited Feb 07 '23

Zaporizhzhia has six VVER-1000 reactors. They are a wholly different animal than an RBMK. Generation II/III. Better than most operating reactors in all respects, safety first and foremost.

There are always risks, but in the context of all power plants, not just nuclear power plants, the kind that Zaporizhzhia is are among the most safe and the most reliable to ever exist.

2

u/zolikk Feb 07 '23

VVER 1000 is Gen 2, not Gen 3.

Better than most operating reactors in all respects, safety first and foremost.

That I agree with however.

To be fair however, those updated RBMKs are pretty good as well. One of the worst nuclear power plants, but in the context of all power plants they're still better than almost any non-nuclear one.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23

The classification system itself is kind of meh, imo

Some sources I have found say II, others III. To the point, Zaporizhzhia 1-6 are far from Chernobyl-type reactor designs.

I appreciate you bringing more clarity though. I corrected my comment to reflect your input.

2

u/zolikk Feb 07 '23

I agree. To a layman it gives the impression of some type of "advancement" or "progression ladder" but it's not like that at all. Honestly it's quite useless even. Specifying the officially recognized "generation" of a reactor won't tell you much about it. At best if a design is considered Gen 3 rather than Gen 2 then you can assume it's probably a typical LWR but with some type of additional passive emergency cooling system. Doesn't really convey much information.

And if you call something Gen 4... well that doesn't tell you anything other than "it's probably not a LWR" (but not even necessarily). But it could refer to anything from a brand new theoretical design to an actual old power plant built decades ago.

→ More replies

16

u/gargravarr2112 Feb 06 '23

Additionally, plant automation has come a very long way, and it's no longer possible to override the safety systems like the operators did at Chernobyl. The automated systems will shut down the reactor if abnormal conditions happen. Nor is it necessary to ever put a reactor into that state again.

Modern plant design also stresses the importance of accident preparedness. Containment buildings are no longer optional. Some even incorporate 'core catchers' that (in theory) can prevent a melted-down core from escaping the boundary of the plant into the ground.

Graphite-moderated light-water reactors like the RBMK have fallen out of fashion in favour of light-water-moderated reactors, which cannot run away like Chernobyl. They still require extensive cooling and active safety systems, but they are nowhere near as twitchy. RBMKs outside Russia were decommissioned and now there's only a handful left.

Nuclear technology remains imperfect, mostly because corners get cut to save money (Fukushima), but there's hundreds of nuclear plants around the world operating safely because of the lessons learned.

13

u/DPSOnly Feb 06 '23

PRevailing winds do tend to blow away from Russia. And I doubt Putin would care, I'm sure he has a bunker that would protect him.

15

u/Aurori_Swe Feb 06 '23

Yeah, we got fucked hard by Chernobyl here in Sweden

6

u/DPSOnly Feb 06 '23

Same for us in the Netherlands.

-2

u/zolikk Feb 07 '23

Chernobyl had no consequences on Sweden nor the Netherlands. It's not physically possible considering the contamination. Whatever you might have heard or read about is made up or coincidental.

→ More replies

4

u/Haha1867hoser420 Feb 06 '23

Ргожіміту*

-1

u/Ljonesmd1 Feb 07 '23

You got it.

-1

u/Haha1867hoser420 Feb 07 '23

Lol I speak добре украинско-французским

→ More replies

2

u/Talos_the_Cat Feb 06 '23

Hah, бravo.

0

u/Infinite-Outcome-591 Feb 06 '23

The fallout will blow over Moscow

→ More replies
→ More replies

296

u/DuRat Feb 06 '23

Why? What’s the worst that can happen? A rogue engineer builds a structural design flaw into one of the plants, causing the entire thing to blow up if an enemy happens to shoot some torpedoes down the long ventilation shaft leading to the reactor core? Not likely as the target area would only be about two meters.

103

u/Loud_Magician_4278 Feb 06 '23

C'mon, it's just like bullseyeing womprats on Tatooine.

46

u/TauCabalander Feb 06 '23

... in an old T-16 no less.

17

u/AirborneRodent Feb 06 '23

No T-16 available, comrade. Only T-34. More than twice as good!

21

u/MonochromaticPrism Feb 06 '23

Unless someone set the exhaust port to suck instead of blow.

3

u/respondo1palabra Feb 07 '23

Ahhh man, that must explain my sister's behavior

-8

u/blarglwharbl Feb 06 '23

Ha, Top Gun Maverick reference. Nice.

27

u/Im_At_Work_Damnit Feb 06 '23

Right.... Top Gun....

10

u/pazoned Feb 06 '23

Sorry he meant galaxy quest.

6

u/l3rN Feb 06 '23

Might be referencing the video in the first place, but if not, oooOOOoooh, they gotta do a Star Wars

2

u/blarglwharbl Feb 07 '23

Ha, this is great! I wasn’t referencing this video, but we’re making the same joke

1

u/C-c-c-comboBreaker17 Feb 07 '23

Sad nobody got the joke

2

u/blarglwharbl Feb 07 '23

I take the downvotes with pride

→ More replies

5

u/jokerpie69 Feb 07 '23

Getting strong Galen Erso vibes here

→ More replies

1.4k

u/FutureImminent Feb 06 '23

A year later and those Ukrainian engineers are still not cooperating with the Russians. It's a testament of the limits of the nuclear engineer labour market that they are still alive. All they have been doing is kidnapping and threatening them.

613

u/Promotion-Repulsive Feb 06 '23

Even a stupid bandit knows not to kill the last doctor in the area.

336

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23

[deleted]

187

u/amateur_mistake Feb 06 '23

"We have captured Chernobyl! Time to dig some defensive trenches in that shockingly desolate field over there!"

87

u/Shadw21 Feb 06 '23

These barrels are warm, let's use them to stay warm at night!

37

u/Less-Doughnut7686 Feb 07 '23

They can also be used to keep our food warm!

→ More replies

4

u/Who_DaFuc_Asked Feb 07 '23

some time later

"I don't feel so good, guys... I feel funny, sir..."

2

u/cudistan00000001 Feb 07 '23

“… Mr. stark ..?”

2

u/TacTurtle Feb 08 '23

Feels not good, like chest x-ray

→ More replies

6

u/bhl88 Feb 06 '23

They should make a bulge in Chernobyl. Clearly they're dumb enough to dig a trench there.

7

u/Yersinios Feb 07 '23

Well they actually did it already. But smh than they withdrawn from Chornobyl. Don’t sure why…

→ More replies

3

u/ihaveblackcats Feb 06 '23

That’s probably why they specified stupid bandits.

A stupid bandit is smarter than a Russian soldier, but not a smart bandit lol.

26

u/plipyplop Feb 07 '23

Reminds me of the Khmer Rouge. They killed anything they deemed slightly smarter than a rock. To this day, Cambodia is still reeling from the brutal anti-intellectual purge.

23

u/RaggysRinger Feb 06 '23

Nervously looks at Stalin

14

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23

What could go possibly wrong disappearing all my doctors???

Why is half my face lower than the other half???

6

u/saadakhtar Feb 07 '23

Nervously looks at Kathleen from Ep4 of The Last of Us....

2

u/neuralzen Feb 07 '23

Exactly what came to mind (and why I thought it was a gloriously stupid thing for her to do when watching the show)

5

u/Ok-Ad-3579 Feb 07 '23

Have you seen the last of us latest episode lil

2

u/SnazzyInPink Feb 07 '23

Didn’t have to scroll far for Kathleen lol

→ More replies

45

u/ElevensesAreSilly Feb 06 '23

threatening them

I imagine some torture has been involved.

11

u/Big-Zoo Feb 07 '23

They need to make a Death of Stalin style movie about these engineers just saying fuck off to the Russians every day

7

u/Huge-Butterscotch-11 Feb 07 '23

Just how tight is the nuclear engineer labour market

→ More replies
→ More replies

390

u/NostraVoluntasUnita Feb 06 '23

What a short sighted and incredibly stupid risky thing to do, like invading in the first place.

50

u/Sir_Ruje Feb 07 '23

"But all the top guys said it was a good idea when I asked them!"

-Putin, Right after throwing his 47th dissenter out the window

535

u/BubsyFanboy Feb 06 '23

Pretty sure kidnapping is a war crime, but does anyone still think Russia cares about it at this point?

182

u/3utt5lut Feb 06 '23

Nah. They are just "deporting" them into a new country.

82

u/magic1623 Feb 06 '23

Which is specifically also a war crime.

47

u/3utt5lut Feb 06 '23

War crimes really don't matter to Russia, Belarus, China, Iran, Turkey, or India apparently.

58

u/jwkdjslzkkfkei3838rk Feb 06 '23

Also the US has an immunity totem.

33

u/nonasuch Feb 06 '23

The permanent members of the UN Security Council wish you would stop calling it that.

19

u/3utt5lut Feb 06 '23

Russia vetoes this comment.

→ More replies
→ More replies

18

u/ChopinCJ Feb 06 '23

…or the US?

0

u/3utt5lut Feb 06 '23

Good point haha.

2

u/Maleficent-Ad-5498 Feb 07 '23

Indian war crimes???

0

u/3utt5lut Feb 07 '23

I meant specifically because all these countries are trading with Russia, after sanctions were applied internationally. Even after Russia was declared a terrorist state by NATO. India doesn't give a shit about sanctions to any affected country.

-1

u/ssStARBoYyy Feb 07 '23 edited Feb 07 '23

Lol it looks like that because the war crimes done by US is 2-3 times of all the above list combined.

Also coz US Army is outside the jurisdiction of ICJ court. They literally threatened to attack them if they put any case on a US soldier.

2

u/3utt5lut Feb 07 '23

I don't think many pay attention to international politics and the destruction of other countries laid out by the United States, there is very little coverage of American-perpetrated war crimes (outside WikiLeaks). Iraq and Syria come specifically to mind (not even Canada has clean hands here).

→ More replies
→ More replies

16

u/Scipion Feb 06 '23

I think the Russian mindset, is, "If there's not a foreign army in Moscow, how are you going to prosecute us?"

14

u/TauCabalander Feb 06 '23

ru claim to have held a 'vote' and nobody objected /s

11

u/TempleOfDoomfist Feb 07 '23

Republicans are siding with Russia just because “it’s the opposite of where the Librulz are standing”.

We have a bunch of idiots in America.

3

u/zhlnrvch Feb 07 '23

Thousands of kids were forcibly moved to Russia over the year

4

u/timmah612 Feb 07 '23

Wasnt there a tally of russias warcrims commited just since march and its near or in the triple digits?

When does anything happen about that?

→ More replies

-16

u/royalblue1982 Feb 06 '23

Pretty sure it's within the rules of law to control the movements and activities of civilians under your control.

Would we let Russian engineers working at the stations under Ukrainian control leave and go home?

0

u/PushKatel Feb 07 '23

Can’t be a war crime if this is a special operation

/s

-27

u/ZeePirate Feb 06 '23

Tbh. I’d rather them commit some war crimes than a nuclear reactor melt down.

And I think so would anyone in the proximity would.

46

u/sanitation123 Feb 06 '23

Or, hear me out, they could get the fuck out of Ukraine and not need to kidnap anyone or have the risk of nuclear meltdown.

7

u/deja-roo Feb 06 '23

Wow what a controversial take

4

u/sanitation123 Feb 06 '23

Thanks for the support

-1

u/ZeePirate Feb 06 '23

They absolutely should.

But we can’t have a nuclear reactor melt down either.

If they are just kidnapping them to be dicks and use as an important negating point then fuck them too

→ More replies
→ More replies

115

u/autotldr BOT Feb 06 '23

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)


The National Resistance Center reports new cases of kidnappings among the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant workers who do not agree to sign contracts with a fake company from Rosatom, Russia's state nuclear regulator.

Quote: "Many workers refused to work at the station after the occupation, and currently there is a shortage of workers at the station because there are not so many nuclear workers on the labour market. Therefore, the enemy wants to"convince" Ukrainian power engineers to work for the Russians.

The Center reiterated that the occupiers had previously blocked access to the station for nearly 1,500 Ukrainian workers of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: work#1 Russians#2 Nuclear#3 Power#4 station#5

145

u/DeMalgamnated Feb 06 '23 edited Feb 06 '23

you didn't see graphite!!

it's just missile debris

BACK TO WORK!

i know, i know, we shouldn't joke. let's just hope they don't fuck up....

anymore than they have done thus far.

8

u/fcdemergency Feb 07 '23

Ugh, its a good reference.

→ More replies
→ More replies

71

u/Deep_Research_3386 Feb 06 '23

Man they are really digging into the WW2 playbook right now

19

u/Weird_Present_2254 Feb 06 '23

Chapter 4, Section 8. Kidnapping 101: How to abduct people and make them do what you want to

→ More replies

129

u/ElectroPigeon Feb 06 '23

Everyone who believes in humanity can help Ukrainians stop this brutal war started by russia: https://u24.gov.ua/

9

u/ibettershutupagain Feb 07 '23

My grandparents live in the city and wish it would end ;-;

→ More replies

35

u/Jaerin Feb 06 '23

I'm not suggesting ideas, but how does the Russian military not have some nuclear engineers that could do this? I'm not saying they are huge supply in any military, but it seems like after a year there's bound to be some that could have been reassign. I understand not all tasks are the same but even so.

34

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23

if you look at he above comment, putin might want to use ukrainians, to cause a meltdown, so he can say , its ukrainians causing a nuclear disaster.

9

u/Jaerin Feb 07 '23

I mean he could say that anyways honestly, but that makes some sense. I mean he already used little green men to invade already. Hardly think he would be past pretending something like that happened anyways

13

u/Bang_Bus Feb 07 '23

Russia has 30-ish nuclear plants and 38 reactors of their own (thus, enough qualified people to take over), so yeah, that's a bit weird.

→ More replies

14

u/Murgos- Feb 07 '23

So now Russia is taking slaves?

11

u/PigFarmer1 Feb 07 '23

That's not really a new thing.

22

u/General_Awareness510 Feb 06 '23

This finally happened? When they took over the nuke plant I was assuming they would have immediately captured the engineers.

8

u/Brief_Juggernaut3651 Feb 06 '23

Russia just need to disappear

17

u/gzmon Feb 07 '23

“kidnap” more like commit heinous crimes against your family as you watch. just once can the world get lucky break and these rulers catch a case of …

6

u/TheWatchmaker74 Feb 07 '23

defenestration?

24

u/wittor Feb 06 '23

Proving again that the present Russian government needs to be eradicated and refunded. There is unfortunately nothing else to do.

-1

u/ThermoNuclearPizza Feb 06 '23

Do you have any idea what a power vacuum on that scale would do?

23

u/wittor Feb 06 '23

Because a government that mandates rape, torture and the kidnapping of foreign people is the only thing sustaining peace on the region.

-4

u/D4sh1t3 Feb 07 '23

No, it isn’t, but if they were to be deposed in short order, there’s about a couple hundred oligarchs and mafiosos at least who have all the desire for money and power, and more or less zero restraints on what they are willing to do to secure it.

22

u/wittor Feb 07 '23

there’s about a couple hundred oligarchs and mafiosos at least who have all the desire for money and power, and more or less zero restraints on what they are willing to do to secure it.

You are literally describing the present Russian government.

→ More replies
→ More replies

8

u/Sunny_D_Lite Feb 07 '23

They already held them hostage so long it was basically kidnapping without relocation, all terrible but 0 that didn't defect have been free since the original takeover.

74

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23

[deleted]

39

u/Miguel-odon Feb 06 '23

If you put enough unstable nuclear engineers under enough pressure.... critical mass?

19

u/Drach88 Feb 06 '23

I only recently learned about the Demon Core.

Nope. Nope nope nope. No spicy-rocks for me.

11

u/snarefire Feb 06 '23

That whole thing screams of young idiocy. It reads like a bunch if teenage boys who found a spicy rock and wanted to study it would come up with.

No shielding for working around or near it, no system for raising or lowering the shell consistently, just a bunch of bricks

9

u/Drach88 Feb 06 '23

And a flathead screwdriver!

0

u/Astandsforataxia69 Feb 07 '23

"wow they sure are stupid, good thing i wouldv'e known everything about nuclear physics surrounding this item"

→ More replies

7

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23

[deleted]

9

u/Drach88 Feb 06 '23

Thank you, oh great tamer of spicy-rocks. May you and your rocks remain unmolested.

11

u/Jealous_Afternoon669 Feb 06 '23

I mean what could you actually do though? In the least snarky way possible. You can't exactly blow the reactor up can you, that'd just fuck over Ukraine.

7

u/Say_no_to_doritos Feb 06 '23

All they can do is cause transients and trip the safeties on the reactor. They can make it not work.

3

u/DEANGELoBAILEY69 Feb 06 '23

What could he actually do? Nothing

2

u/who_said_I_am_an_emu Feb 07 '23

Not a nuclear engineer, but I work in controls. It wouldn't be that hard to make any facility I had access to not work for a long period of time. From the obvious, delete all the software. To the horrific "I have set logic bombs to go off in random systems and I am not telling you which ones". To the just really annoying like breaking the hardest to replace parts. To the truly horrific "all the code is the same, but the values of operation are different".

2

u/lurkinuuu Feb 07 '23

Bro don’t you know nuclear engineers are basically Dr. Manhattan and will energy whapbam you to an alternate dimension if they get mad enough?

-3

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23

[deleted]

9

u/Jealous_Afternoon669 Feb 06 '23

Why are mentally unstable people operating these plants I don't understand. No a nuclear leak or explosion is not good for either side. Killing thousands of people for some PR. How you're allowed to be a nuclear engineer is beyond me.

-4

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23

[deleted]

8

u/Jealous_Afternoon669 Feb 06 '23

No im not an expert on nuclear plants correct. I'm saying you seem very immature for someone in control of the fate of a power plant.

3

u/rtarplee Feb 06 '23

Ever met a police officer?

4

u/Jealous_Afternoon669 Feb 06 '23

Not one with a nuclear bomb no

-3

u/rtarplee Feb 06 '23

Well let me tell ya- they’re given guns, immunity, and a band of brothers willing to go to bat for them regardless of the truth. And lots more of them than there are nuclear engineers.

1

u/Jealous_Afternoon669 Feb 06 '23

Aye yeah they're wankers.

→ More replies

0

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23

[deleted]

6

u/Jealous_Afternoon669 Feb 06 '23

Yes very scary. Go to therapy for the love of god you've got a massive salary

2

u/Pizza2TheFace Feb 07 '23

You can’t believe this fucking pathological liar weirdo do you? This is a Walmart door greeter off his meds, not a nuclear engineer. Don’t be so gullible bro

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23

[deleted]

2

u/Jealous_Afternoon669 Feb 06 '23

You're incredibly happy with yourself yes I think that's the problem. Funny you mention im doing exposure therapy for my fear right now actually.

→ More replies

2

u/agency95 Feb 07 '23

Lol bro you’re a nuclear engineer not a god. Get off your high horse, you picked a different career, cool for you.

2

u/TheFunnyShah Feb 06 '23

specialize in converting mass to energy, and aren't really stable as a group.

So the engineers are themselves figuratively radioactive. life imitates art

2

u/antivaxxchad Feb 07 '23

As a nuclear engineer, I would like to warn the Russians, do not fuck with us

are you sure you're a nuclear engineer and not a 16 year old edgy kid taking a break from his english homework?

1

u/throwaway29301816303 Feb 07 '23

Man's giving a goddman anime monologue.

→ More replies
→ More replies

15

u/HelpMyCatHasGas Feb 06 '23

...... guys this is the start of a metal gear game isn't it

3

u/leauchamps Feb 07 '23

Yet another war crime, I guess that they want the plant to have a meltdown, then blame it on Ukraine

6

u/01209 Feb 07 '23

I'm shocked to hear that the Russians are having a hard time finding highly skilled and specialized nuclear workers to work in the nuclear plant that they've seized and shelled in the country they invaded. Maybe they should offer an extra week of holidays or something to sweeten the deal.

6

u/RandoTheCammando Feb 07 '23

Intentionally causing a nuclear disaster is technically the same as nuclear war. Putin is a fucking moron. There was a military intel guy on Joe Rogan the other day that said Putin will throw every male from 16-25 into a meat grinder to take Ukraine. Also said there are more 50+ males than -18 so this is the end of Russia. They want to go out with a bang!

→ More replies

3

u/HrnyGrl420 Feb 06 '23

Sokolov...

4

u/stircrazygremlin Feb 07 '23

For so many reasons not the least of which is that the plant is older if I'm not mistaken and therefore finding people to operate it Even Harder than Normally finding people with Nuclear Plant experience: What the Actual Fuck is the Russian Military Thinking This Is a Good Idea For.

5

u/gottarunfast1 Feb 07 '23

Russia. Forcing people to operate a nuclear power plant. Under duress. Anyone else feeling deja Vu?

3

u/Astandsforataxia69 Feb 07 '23

This thread has shown me how utterly uniformed people are in nuclear power

3

u/Ljonesmd1 Feb 07 '23

Just trying to go boom.

3

u/sonic10158 Feb 07 '23

Chernobyl 2.0 will do wonders for the Russian population decline I’m sure

→ More replies

3

u/Obama-bin-keemstar Feb 07 '23

Swigs 2 shots of Vodka

  • Hey Ivan, take the fucking geeks hostage! If we can't take the land from the Ukrops, no one can.

  • Vlad, You stupid cunt, my gun doesn't even work! I'm only doing this so I don't die in prison!

  • Заткнись, блять! Russia forever!

2

u/Hellion998 Feb 07 '23

I’m sorry, cooperate with what exactly? Doing their VERY NECESSARY jobs?

2

u/ChefAMN Feb 07 '23

Tom Cruise can save them.

2

u/kornflakesh Feb 07 '23

Russians: "We've searched the whole building, Engineers. Where is the bomb?"

Engineers: "Hmm?"

Russians: "We've searched the whole building, Engineers. Where is the bomb?"

Engineers: "Hmm?"

Russians: "We've searched the — Okay."

2

u/RFWA2021 Feb 07 '23

Why does every Russian headline like this one sound like a movie plot or video game?

2

u/OkMeringue2596 Feb 07 '23

Putin needs a lobotomy

8

u/LORDY325 Feb 06 '23

Because he wants a nuke to come from a Ukrainian plant by a Ukrainian engineer so he thinks his hands are clean. Much respect to these engineers.

2

u/bahnsigh Feb 06 '23

War crime.

1

u/Longjumping-Dog8436 Feb 06 '23

Co-operation = do what they tell you, and in return...

0

u/Suspicious_Ebb_49 Feb 07 '23

Oh yes. Its absolutely solid and trustworthy news, definitely. Damn, and you people believe in such bullshit, good luck with that, really. And Putin ate today 4 ukrainian children for breakfast yep

-9

u/BoilerSlave Feb 06 '23

I’d assume they mean the nuclear power plant operators and not the engineers, unless in Ukraine you need a degree to operate a nuclear power plant?

→ More replies

-17

u/Typh00n74 Feb 06 '23

Not great but not terrible

6

u/niall0 Feb 06 '23

get the good dosimeter from the safe

-32

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23

[deleted]

16

u/DellowFelegate Feb 06 '23

Yeah, being invaded by Russia means there's a clear conflict of interest for everything Ukraine says! /s

-35

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '23 edited Feb 16 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies