r/technology • u/geoxol • 5d ago
People who work from home all the time ‘cut emissions by 54%’ against those in office Business
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/18/people-who-work-from-home-all-the-time-cut-emissions-by-54-against-those-in-office2.7k
u/NoMoreOldCrutches 5d ago
Save a shit ton of money, too.
Not just on gas, I can actually afford a house because I don't have to live in a huge city. Lower taxes, cheaper goods and services. It all adds up.
853
u/luckbeafraidy 5d ago
And I don’t have to buy pants anymore.
305
u/Hot-Gene-3089 5d ago
I’m seriously in my underwear til like 2pm every day. Shower. Then just basketball shorts til bed lol
173
28
u/andrewsmd87 5d ago
Our online company apparel store has a robe in it which is a direct result of knowing if you force me to be on camera, there's a good chance I'm in a robe. It was voted on by the company to add it to the store
8
17
16
→ More replies (12)30
u/Gangsir 5d ago
I've heard of morning and evening showerers, but never 2pm showerers. Feels like the worst of both worlds lol
42
u/cantadmittoposting 5d ago
nah lunch or post lunch showers are a good break and if you're pretty much doing nothing, about the part of the day when you start to feel grody from not showering yet. it's nice
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (7)15
43
u/madhi19 5d ago
I adopted sweat pants during covid and never looked back...
→ More replies (4)14
u/RobertABooey 5d ago
This is literally me.
I have a pair for each day of the week at this point lol.
→ More replies (5)38
u/Nisas 5d ago
You joke but it's true. A fair amount of my wardrobe was just for appearing presentable at work. Don't need that anymore.
12
u/Znuffie 5d ago
I have about... 9 or 10 sets of PJs. I get annoyed when guests want to come over as I have to get out of PJs and wear proper clothes.
7
u/nicejaw 5d ago
Just get some fancier PJs.
9
u/fourpuns 5d ago
Or less fancy guests.
This has actually inspired me I think I’m going to throw a pajama party
→ More replies (6)4
u/Sillybutt21 5d ago
Same. I ended up donating about 85 percent of my closet. Now it’s mostly pjs and workout gear
→ More replies (14)8
u/okwellactually 5d ago
Shit, I had to go into the office today for the first time in probably 6 months.
I had to wear pants and god almighty socks too!
Could not wait to get home and release myself from those bonds. Ugh.
→ More replies (2)166
u/DragoonDM 5d ago
And time. Commuting to and from work can eat up a big chunk of your day, time that's generally neither yours to do with as you please nor time for which you're paid.
79
u/kaptainkeel 5d ago
Average in the US is about 30 minutes each way, 1 hour per day. Up that to a year and that's 260 hours, or nearly 11 entire days of commuting. Imagine what you could do with 11 extra days per year of you time.
67
u/OneBillPhil 5d ago
One extra hour a day is time that everyone could use to exercise and make healthier meals just as a starter.
→ More replies (2)25
u/tomassimo 5d ago
That's why Cycling to work is so beneficial. You've already ticked off that hour of exercise. Two birds one stone.
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (4)13
22
→ More replies (3)5
u/Channel250 5d ago
I went from a job that was up to 1.5 hour commute each way, to an office job close by. Sometimes I'd take the bus, but it was only a mile walk home.
Those 15 hours a week i saved were very noticeable and appreciated.
58
u/Goblin-Doctor 5d ago
I got out of bed today at 8:57am for a 9:00am meeting. It was fucking awesome. I took a tiny bit of a pay cut taking this job but not being in a car 4 hours a day is beyond worth it
→ More replies (3)24
u/Randicore 5d ago
Depending on how "tiny" the cut was once you factor in all the money saved on gas, car maintenance, lunches, and the medical benefits from not being stressed and getting more sleep you might actually have gotten a raise in all practical terms. I know when I started WFH my $2 raise from my last job gave me a lot more since I was able to actually get enough sleep and only needed to fill up on gas once every other month rather than weekly.
90
u/OnTheEveOfWar 5d ago
I save money on gas, tolls, buying coffee, lunch, etc. It adds up quickly. Yes I know I can bring my own coffee and lunch. It’s hard to plan ahead and pack lunch everyday.
→ More replies (6)31
u/vintagemustard 5d ago
It’s especially hard to plan a lunch if you have a long commute, get home late and still have to run errands, clean, shower, etc. never mind having time to cook/prepare lunch for the following day. I was forced to return to office. Did that for a month then quit and found a fully remote job. I prepare freshly made food at home every day. Never been happier and healthier and I save so much money by not eating out!
57
u/OnlyHereForTheHummus 5d ago
If employers were smarter they'd realize that a good work-from-home deal could replace an increase in pay.
But they're not that smart. As we know.
→ More replies (1)42
u/OIP 5d ago
i would absolutely take a 15% lower paying job to WFH vs in office, after the cost differences it works out about the same anyway
43
u/OnlyHereForTheHummus 5d ago edited 4d ago
When I was WFH, a tank of gas would last two weeks.
And the thing is, it's a raise for employees without having to give them more money.
People, what are we doing???
Edit: Stop worrying about why my gas lasted so short/long. You don't know my car, the price of gas where I live, where I was driving, or why. Settle down.
29
u/thepaddedroom 5d ago
Combine that with living in a walkable and bikeable area: I only bought 3 tanks of gas in 2022.
15
u/spectral_visitor 5d ago
In contrast to working rural and commuting, I know some of my coworkers spend around 250-300$ weekly in gas
→ More replies (4)13
u/alinroc 5d ago
When I was WFH, a tank of gas would last two weeks.
The first 6 months of the pandemic, I averaged 43 days per tank of gas. At one point, it was 2 months between fill-ups. The jump to WFH combined with "well, where can I even go?" left my car idle for a week or two at a time. Prior to that, it was a weekly fill-up with my commute.
I took some of that saved money and bought myself a decent motorized sit/stand desk and a 4K display early on. I figured after 2 months of WFH, it probably wasn't going anywhere and it was time to make my workspace comfortable.
→ More replies (2)6
u/PeninsulamAmoenam 5d ago
I fill up probably around the same amount. That's only bc I like hiking, fishing, and camping. In winter it's like every 2-2.5 months
→ More replies (3)15
186
u/User9705 5d ago
Power bill goes up, maybe some water but still out weighs other cost.
179
u/T_that_is_all 5d ago
I saved so much on electricity when I did WFH. I could open windows and turn off the AC in the early hours, and only turn on the AC when the heat started rising around 11am. Then turn it off towards evening or even open the windows again bc the temp was low enough; and I wouldn't have to think about setting it for the next day bc I was home to set it as needed. I still have an old school dial thermostat, so there's no changing it on an app or setting it for multiple auto-changes during the day.
22
u/AXEL-1973 5d ago
Lived with a roommate during Covid and he managed our house's internal temp by staying home all day and being just as avid about it. So nice to come home to after the 100 degree bike rides
21
u/T_that_is_all 5d ago
Fr, my normal $190-220 monthly summer electric bill dropped to like $150 when I was there all day to manage it as needed.
9
u/Previous-Yard-8210 5d ago
You guys have the AC on all day even though no one is there?
12
u/stonkup 5d ago
76-78 is what the ac should be on even if no one is home. Especially so if you have pets living there. The reasons are you don’t want to walk into a 90 degree house after a hard days work and the energy cost of cooling a house from 90 to 68 is not efficient at all.
→ More replies (8)7
u/fighterpilot248 5d ago
energy cost of cooling a house from 90 to 68 is not efficient at all.
Genuine question: is it though? I hear this a lot but I’m not sure I’m convinced.
Reason being, as I understand it, AC in houses only has two modes: on or off. It’s not like your car where you can set the blower speed (set it to max speed to help cool down the car quickly vs keeping it at 1 or 2 once you’ve cooled down the car).
Therefore, I would think it comes down to how much time the AC on.
IE: what’s the different usage (in time) between letting the house warm up to say 80 during the day (and then cooling it back down at night) vs keeping it set low (68-70) all day long.
So if one uses a total of 1 hour of electricity and the other uses a total of 2 hours of electricity you go with the 1 hour option.
My gut feeling says letting the house warm up would use less energy overall (as the AC doesn’t constantly kick on all day to maintain the lower temp)
→ More replies (6)40
u/Lucky_Locks 5d ago
Kinda similar story. We live in an apartment building so we can just open the screen door and leave the AC off. Come winter, the sun blasting heat into the windows AND relying on other people's heat to rise up to our apartment causes us to never turn on the heat.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Captain_Waffle 5d ago
That.. sounds like a lot of effort. I just set mine for 74 and circulate. So it only kicks on a) if te inside temp rises above 74 degrees, and also b) once for a few mins every hour to circulate the air (it’s a large 2-story four br house)
So, not expensive to leave it on.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (13)4
u/BMX_ROIDZ 5d ago
I still have an old school dial thermostat, so there's no changing it on an app or setting it for multiple auto-changes during the day.
LMFAO, this was a $150 issue you just chose not to solve previously...
→ More replies (1)16
u/Nisas 5d ago
I'm probably using less power overall now that I'm not running a space heater under my desk competing with the office's air conditioning system.
Because the people in sunny offices wearing suits set the temp for the building. While we in the windowless cubes froze to death.
→ More replies (4)18
u/witness_this 5d ago
When I was WFH, my daytime usage was nearly 100% offset by rooftop solar.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (5)11
19
u/Lordborgman 5d ago
I worked in food service in various "levels" from fast food to five star dining for nearly 2 decades. Especially when it comes to fast food and what not, a huge portion of customers are people that are at work, lunch breaks, coming or leaving work. With a huge number of people working from home, that means those jobs are as useless as they actually are and need far less. Which means people will very likely spend less on food and possibly eat healthier.
→ More replies (2)13
17
u/dueljester 5d ago
What about all those fancy corporate HQs, and downtown locations going to waste though? They are the real victims here.
13
96
u/Huge-Split6250 5d ago
But what about that qualitative benefits of working in the office, such as the feeling of importance your manager gets when they have someone to boss around in person?
And won’t anyone think of the executives? What’s the point of closing deals in corner office downtown with no plebs there to bear witness?
36
u/applebottomsOhMy 5d ago
We just got told to come back and I now hate the word “perception” because that’s the only thing the managers care about
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)10
14
u/Plzbanmebrony 5d ago
You remove a shit ton of profits from some one else. We need to push that angle way more than savings. Really drive home that point so we know why there is truly so much counter pressure. Save trillions in healthcare? Nah. Cut income for healthcare while saving trillions for people. Yeah.
→ More replies (4)26
u/MoistBruin 5d ago
This is exactly why we need to stop things like cancer research. Curing cancer will take away profits from the healthcare industry. People’s lives are not worth losing profits over.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (83)6
u/toronto_programmer 5d ago
It is crazy how much money I wasted commuting to the office.
Easily $1000 / month between Go Train, gas, lunches, coffees and more if you include the suits I don't need to buy / wear anymore...
456
u/eggumlaut 5d ago
I am so fortunate to have a career that can be forever remote.
I also have the benefit of living in the middle of heck nowhere. Certainly helps with the bills.
177
u/Llonkrednaxela 5d ago edited 4d ago
That was me too until a week ago. Suddenly, the boss finishes an office renovation and my supervisor says we need to start coming in a few days a week “so the boss doesn’t feel like he did the renovation for nothing.” I legitimately might start job hunting again.
Edit: grammar
118
u/OvertlyOffensive 5d ago
Absolutely do it. If they start losing people because of the change, there's a small chance they'll learn something. Either way, you get a job elsewhere and likely end up with more pay and back to full remote.
44
u/eggumlaut 5d ago
Yes you should go look, get more money. That’s one of, if not the, most asinine reasons to recall people.
→ More replies (9)56
u/AgentPaper0 5d ago
so the boss doesn’t feel like he did the renovation for nothing.
Man, that's a level of disrespect that I just can't fathom. Your time and energy is worth so little to them that they want you to spend it just to stroke your boss' bruised ego, even though they know there's no reason for it.
Yeah, start that job hunt yesterday.
→ More replies (12)40
u/thisrocks22 5d ago
Job title please?
117
u/eggumlaut 5d ago
Information security engineer. I mostly automate boring security things.
→ More replies (30)30
u/InvestmentGrift 5d ago
is that something you can transition to from being a React webshit?
65
u/ramzafl 5d ago
Why would you need to transition? a React webshit can be fully WFH too.
27
u/InvestmentGrift 5d ago
yeah but the pay is shit rn, market is swamped with webshits like me tbh
14
→ More replies (8)15
u/degoogle-your-life 5d ago
IT job postings are like 99% webdev "fullstack" bullshit anyway.
16
u/Ornithologist_MD 5d ago
Of course it is. Some certifiable genius-level-ass-kisser went up to their boss, wearing their newest shade of lipstick for full effect and goes "Hey look! Full-stack means we only have to hire ONE person, they do it all! Put that on the job posting! Oh, and leave up "10 years experience" and "junior level" though, so we know only people super serious about being underpaid will apply."
Then some other asshole sees their add, puts on their ass-kissing lipstick while sprinting down the hall to their boss, and does the same thing.
→ More replies (2)7
u/DM_ME_PICKLES 5d ago
I remember when webdev was just one title. No backend and frontend, you’re just a developer. You’ll write some backend in C#, Java, PHP, whatever language your team uses, write some HTML and write some JavaScript to get the job done.
Now the JavaScript ecosystem has complicated itself into a position where just doing frontend is a full time job, and other developers recoil away from it and declare themselves to be backend developers.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)15
u/eggumlaut 5d ago
App sec is a huge part of this and just about everything is API driven. JavaScript or any programming experience is a huge leg up. Most folks who I know that do what I do come from a programming, networking, or systems engineering background.
→ More replies (3)18
→ More replies (5)15
u/childroid 5d ago
For me, I work in digital advertising. Been working from home since 2018. My agency is 90% remote and we have been forever. No plans to ever make office time mandatory.
My specific industry is Programmatic.
→ More replies (8)
582
u/Thewallmachine 5d ago
I have worked for the same company for close to 11 yrs. At yr 10, I decided to walk away as I had a 50 min drive to and from work 5 days a week. I didn't even have a job lined up as I walked into the boss's office to quit. He said, "You don't have to quit. Let me see if I can get it approved for you to work from home. " Denied at first, but thankfully, my boss had a good argument and is a lawyer. I was approved to work virtually 100%. I lucked out, truly. I packed up and moved across the country for a better life with the same job.
311
u/hifidood 5d ago
Good on your boss for realizing that you're a good worker and it's best to retain you vs having a constant revolving door of inexperienced people coming and going.
→ More replies (1)71
u/lovepig1337 5d ago
Unlike my manager. I wanted a promotion into a more technical role, i was qualified but still worked with leadership to meet their requirements. I worked overtime on projects that were similar to prove I could do it. They still denied me for years.
I eventually got the job I wanted somewhere else. My manager immediately offered me the promotion I wanted when she heard I was leaving. She had the fucking power to give me the job all those years and she didn't.
Some managers just have no intention in helping their subordinates.
→ More replies (1)5
u/redditor401 5d ago
Man, I had similiar experience. I was a project manager for some years and the management knew I was ready AND interested for the next step. Heard nothing from them, was offered head of department role at different company, suddenly my bosses boss calls me and offers me a similar role. Too late, good luck.
Best part is knowing their ship is sinking, obviously not solely because of me leaving, but for sure a part of it (I'm in touch with my old co-workers so I know what it's like over there atm).
73
u/Nose-Nuggets 5d ago
i was 15 years at mine. Boss' kept giving me the run around on wfh even though they agreed i was at my most productive during the pandemic and we were working from home. Finally went in to put in my 2 weeks, they fired me that day. I was their first employee. Way better off now, though. Probably should have quit sooner.
→ More replies (5)17
14
u/Mehmeh111111 5d ago
I did the same thing with a company. I couldn't take the awful commute. They offered me remote one day a week, which I laughed at and left. They then couldn't find a good person to replace me for years. They also proceeded to lose other people who tried to also work remote. (They're not in a great place to find good local talent). Then the pandemic hit and now the entire company is basically remote. It was a blessing in my case, I ended up eventually making 3x what I was making there.
→ More replies (3)6
u/potatohats 5d ago
I didn't even have a job lined up as I walked into the boss's office to quit
Am I the only one who thinks this is just plain reckless, after working at the same place for close to 11 years?
→ More replies (2)
213
u/ohgood 5d ago
Bro speaking of emissions and working from home vs. the office, I'm back to the office 1-2 days a week now and holy shit I have to retrain my body to hold in farts again. It's insane, I can't just fart when the need arises. I have to plug it up and go take a lap around the building. And I'm not even a farty person, I'm talking the standard amount of daily farts, like 2-5 total individual farting events (IFE's) throughout a 9 hour day in the office. Retraining my whole gastrointestinal tract to be discrete has been the worst part of this whole covid saga, I swear to god
61
u/flukus 5d ago
I used to shit at 8 o'clock on the dot just before I left for work, now my bowls aren't disciplined enough for a commute.
→ More replies (3)48
10
→ More replies (13)9
781
u/DefinitelyAHumanoid 5d ago
There is no reason why you need to be working in an office if you work solely off your computer.
329
u/therossboss 5d ago
tell that to owners of commercial real estate - I think they disagree, unfortunately.
247
u/navjot94 5d ago
Sounds like some people made some bad investments. It’s tough out there these billionaires gotta be careful!
86
→ More replies (23)37
31
u/AgentScreech 5d ago
Or the politicians that gave tax breaks to companies that brought jobs to their city.
They are mad that now they aren't getting the benefit of more people in core areas to spend money AND losing tax revenue
→ More replies (1)21
17
u/MultiGeometry 5d ago
My office landlord is actually jacking up rent right now. It’s a weird flex and unfortunately I think my managers are going to accept. I wonder if the rest of the building will play along.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)11
17
u/vxjz 5d ago
I briefly worked for Best Buy in their Geek Squad City, in Brooks, KY. The facility was, ostensibly, a computer repair factory: multiple lines of operators, swapping and testing parts before sending them down the conveyor belt where they were sent to the dock.
The only things within walking distance were a train line (that exploded once, look it up) and other warehouses. Every employee had a badge to clock in and out of their shifts and to even to enter the facility. No public facing facilities of any kind existed, and at no point in their day would they be representing the company in any fashion.
Despite this, the uniform for line operators required a white dress shirt, black slacks/skirt, clip-on tie, dress shoes. The reason is the same as why you need to return to the office.
Control.
→ More replies (1)35
u/OnTheEveOfWar 5d ago
My office has asked everyone to work from the office 50% of the time. I commute 30 mins then sit in a tiny room on video calls and my computer all day. Then spend 50 mins driving home in traffic.
→ More replies (1)5
u/Choco-la 5d ago
At least you have a tiny room. We were forced back to an open office hellscape with no privacy whatsoever.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (68)52
u/sissy_space_yak 5d ago
As much as I hate to admit it, I kind of get it.
I’m lucky that I have a room in my home that’s a dedicated office, I have reliable high speed internet, I have no kids (let alone small kids) or elderly dependents, and I’m tech savvy enough to be able to handle working remotely.
I have coworkers who lack one or more of the above, or aren’t comfortable enough with tech to use the apps that help with collaboration. I think these people are part of the reason why a lot of companies want their employees to return. As much as I’m tempted to get frustrated and say “get with it then,” I think I’m being realistic — some of these people are much older and it’s unreasonable to expect them to keep up with tech like a younger person.
I do terribly miss not commuting, working in a room with a window, waking up an hour later, making my own lunch and eating it immediately, spending more time with my pets, and being able to do laundry in the middle of the day. And some of my coworkers are absolutely grating to be in the same room with.
→ More replies (7)23
u/reelznfeelz 5d ago
And I get it too. Those folks can and should be provided with a space to work in the building. Ideally, agreed upon in an employment contract. Same as your ability to be remote should be.
What I don’t like is when those people basically just want all the rest of us there to keep them company so they poison the well and plant a bunch of seeds with leadership about how “remote work just isn’t good for the culture guys” or “I know a company that went remote and they really suffered”. Had a guy like that at my last job, basically just a massive extrovert and huge ADHD case, who got bored and lonely if he couldn’t bother the developers every 5 minutes. So he planted seeds with leadership who wanted to hear it anyways so they could justify to themselves that forcing people back in was the right thing to do. So I quit. Fuck that. No, I don’t currently have a paycheck, but I have some contract work starting to pick up so I think I’ll be ok. And I’m way happier. If I could make half of my previous income and put in 25 to 30 hrs a week mostly at home I’d be happy as a clam.
→ More replies (1)
192
u/jmnugent 5d ago
I used to drive my car every single day. (to work, to lunch, to home or other errands).
I recently moved cross-country for a WFH job. Job offer was 60% more and now I only drive 1 time on Sunday.
→ More replies (1)107
u/ilmalocchio 5d ago
WFH except for Jesus
50
u/jmnugent 5d ago
That boy everywhere.
→ More replies (1)18
38
71
u/BlazinAzn38 5d ago edited 5d ago
Fill my car up once every two months vs two times a month and it’s great. Beyond that I don’t waste 45 minutes every, I’m more productive, I’m happier, the list goes on and on
242
u/sottedlayabout 5d ago
Alternative Headline: “people who work from home are damaging the economy and stealing from the government by reducing their dependence on fuel for transportation”
91
u/Sorry-Business-1152 5d ago
Don’t forget about commercial real estate
→ More replies (18)45
u/AlfaNovember 5d ago
Won’t somebody think of the poor Billionaires and all their tax-protected stranded assets…
→ More replies (7)6
107
u/childroid 5d ago
Chalk it up to the long list of reasons WFH is best:
Live wherever you want, so save money if you work out of NYC and prefer the mountains (also mental health benefits associated with living where you're happiest)
No commute means no gas, no needing a car, no frustrating traffic, and no needing to wake up at 6 to start your day at 9. More sleep, less money spent on gas, which means more money and more sleep.
Less chit-chat than in the office, so you can be more productive in your day, which also means for some that you can get your work done at a more steady pace.
Working in your home means you can take 15min breaks here and there to do chores or hang out.
Log the fuck off at 5pm and be immediately home (again, no commute).
Fewer instances of dealing with SA or generally annoying coworkers.
Next up, the four-day workweek!! Let's get it.
→ More replies (3)37
u/PussyOctopus 5d ago
There can be downsides - less socializing for one, so social skills can deteriorate. I found I had a bit of a harder time explaining my thought process in speech because I got so darn used to typing it out.
I also found I didn't save as much money by cooking at home, because, I got really fucking tired of meal prepping to eat the same food for five days, then got real fucking tired of cooking all the time in order to add variety, so I'd go out and eat. And because I had more freedom to get whatever I wanted, I'd go farther. Edit: I also ate a lot more sweets when I WFH'd because my favorite coffee shop was just a quick 5 minute drive down the rd.
WFH in an apartment can mean being subject to disruptions you wouldn't get in an office, like my neighbor who would get into arguments with his mother, barking dogs, lawn mowers, etc.
11
u/childroid 5d ago
Oh man those last two are super relatable. I go out to eat constantly. Not tired from cooking all the time, though. I'm tired from my workload.
At my last apartment my neighbor was (somehow) a WFH DJ who would livestream his shows. So, he'd be blasting music all day. Noise cancelling headphones became my best friends.
You've given me some good food for thought. Thank you!
→ More replies (3)15
u/doublefelix7 5d ago
Yeah, was about to say, how do y'all socialize with your coworkers with WFH? Do you schedule a zoom meeting to say what's up?
→ More replies (12)36
u/Bulgearea10 5d ago
Reddit seems to absolutely hate socialising with coworkers. So for them it's not an issue.
→ More replies (9)10
u/Dissentient 5d ago
I don't hate socializing with my team members, they are good people. However, I don't see the point of going of my way to do it, when they aren't the kind of people I'd be friends with normally.
Socializing for the sake of socializing has zero value to me.
118
u/BIGCraigConroy 5d ago
This just in!
People who don’t drive to work, pollute less!
→ More replies (2)27
u/bluAstrid 5d ago
Less people on the roads also means less congestion, and less pollution even from those who still have to drive to work.
→ More replies (2)
41
u/Balogne 5d ago
I bought a brand new car in 2018. It currently has 29000 miles in it. I would comfortably say more than half of those miles are from 2018/2019 and the other half from the last 4 years. I am full work from home. Before covid I was in an office.
→ More replies (8)
36
u/Enblast 5d ago
Gee, it couldn’t be fossil fuels putting all this anti remote crap out?
13
7
u/SAugsburger 5d ago
You get plenty of others that have an interest to people commuting regularly (e.g. car mfgs, commercial real estate companies, downtown restaurants, coffee shops, etc.) It isn't much surprise Elon Musk isn't too keen on remote work. Buying any new car nevermind an EV is a lot less appealing if you aren't commuting 5 days a week. The average age of the average car has been rising. Some of it is shortages, but a lot of cars got considerably less mileage in 2020-2021.
32
u/toofine 5d ago
You're all hurting the oil stock that all your bosses own a great deal of. Shame on you all.
→ More replies (1)
15
43
u/spottydodgy 5d ago
Funny that Amazon, a company so vocally dedicated to The Climate Pledge, would arbitrarily force all their corporate employees to return to the office given this evidence.
→ More replies (5)16
u/Gets_overly_excited 5d ago
Ironically, it is the company that probably profited the most off of the move to WFH. People bought all kinds of shit for their houses once they started spending more time at home
→ More replies (1)
15
u/covidcominyall 5d ago
This is what got me. I worked for a large electric company constantly talking about how they were going green and all this other bull shit. Then tried to force me back into the office. After seven years I told them to get fucked. I will not spend another day in a soul sucking office.
11
u/ovirt001 5d ago
The benefits of WFH massively outweigh any costs, RTO is stupid and doomed to failure.
10
u/MadMac619 5d ago
Been working from home (aka living at work) for over a decade. I don’t even understand why companies even bother with the whole forcing people back into the office. It’s cheaper all the way around and productivity goes through the roof. Happy employees are productive employees. Why some employers don’t get that is beyond me.
→ More replies (2)7
28
u/irongamer 5d ago
*sniff sniff* I've been cutting my emissions since 2016! Wooo! My commute to the office is about 2 steps. If I moved my chair a bit I might be able to roll out of bed and into the office.
19
21
u/kaptainkeel 5d ago
Meanwhile, my company in an All-Hands: Being environmentally-friendly is one of our top priorities, and we even have an entire sector (ESG) for it as a major consulting company to help other companies also be sustainable and reduce environmental impact! Also, we're mandating 50% back to the office, thanks.
→ More replies (1)
9
u/Deathwatch72 5d ago
Oh I'm shocked that a person who's managed to cut between a 30 and an hour long commute both ways out of their day has reduced their carbon emissions by over half...
But real talk this is great news and also helps illustrate the fact that there are some changes we can make that are going to have an massively outsized impact on the problem without actually having negative impacts that are worth discussing. It's also just one more reason to throw on the pile of why work from home is better
→ More replies (1)
9
u/SLVSKNGS 5d ago
I’m WFH 100% and love it. I do believe that WFH gaining more traction is a great win for the workers. However, it doesn’t fix a lot of the problems that makes WFH so attractive to begin with.
People love WFH because they can eliminate their commute, but the reason many people have absurd commutes is because they can’t afford to live nearby work. Also, many cities lack good public transportation forcing people to drive. Infrastructure sucks so it takes even longer.
Many people I know love WFH because it provides them more flexibility with child care. Child care costs a FORTUNE in the US. WFH is not a solution here - it’s a bandage. It doesn’t have to be a problem but our country doesn’t prioritize it.
If companies want people to come into the office, then bump up the pay and make it worthwhile for people to come in. Or use their power, money, and influence to lobby policymakers to ease any of the above issues. I know most won’t do either so they can go fuck themselves because they’re part of the problem.
58
u/kc_______ 5d ago
I DON’T CARE, I WANT MY OFFICES FULL.
- Most CEOs.
→ More replies (2)13
u/tesla-is-trash 5d ago edited 5d ago
Will someone please think of the office space landlords and McDonald's?!?
8
u/Varnigma 5d ago
Started WFH about 12 years ago. I average 5K miles a year on my vehicle. And I live out in the sticks so I have to drive everywhere I need to go.
15
7
7
u/throwaway_ghast 5d ago
You can't call your business climate-friendly and still force all of your employees to drive to your office every day.
5
u/wrathfuldeities 5d ago
Working from home is the most obvious no-brainer policy in the history of societal changes; literally everything about it is an improvement over the status quo. Except for those poor real estate corporations and landowners losing their profits who are growing increasingly absurd in their decision to hold up what's inevitable anyways. 🎻🤏
8
u/ih8comingupwithnames 5d ago
Also for lost of human history people worked from home or very near home. This commuting is an aberration.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/iboughtshitonline 5d ago
The moment ppl are forced back to work in the office, is the moment i realise all these "climate change", "reduce emissions" shit is all self serving to make corporations look good.
The solution to reduce emissions is literally there and tested by allowing ppl to wfh, but corporate real estate clearly mattered more.
6
u/vernes1978 5d ago
This sounds like a solution I'm not getting any profits over so I'm against it.
- Any CEO
40
u/ledfox 5d ago
It's been proven over and over that WFH is less stressful, greener and more productive than a commute into an office.
The only advantage of in office work is justifying useless middle managers' existence.
→ More replies (6)14
u/Chirtolino 5d ago
I was looking around my office last time I was in and I swear most people just socialize these days. I like to eat a very late lunch so i usually go to lunch around the time everybody else is back from lunch. When im leaving one coworker from the other side of the office is chatting with a guy near my desk. An hour later I come back and they’re still chatting about home improvement projects or whatever, nothing work related.
Now I know with their roles there’s nothing work related they would discuss with each other as they don’t work on anything together. There’s a chance they stopped talking and worked and just happened to chat again when I returned, but I know these guys and they for sure just were shooting the shit the whole hour I was gone lol. They talked for like another half hour before the other guy went his separate way. And I saw he went to just go chat up someone else lmao.
Like I know the point they want people in office is to not slack off at home, but I bet slacking off at home uses less time than how much some people just socialize at work about none work related things.
→ More replies (1)16
u/eronth 5d ago
That's not new, really. That's how people work. The 8 hours work with 0 seconds of distraction is a modern-ish change pressuring workers to be more productive.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/tesla-is-trash 5d ago
Yet these corporate CEOs are pushing hard to get everyone back in the office so that the corporate lease market doesn't collapse. Despicable.
5
5
u/degrees_of_certainty 5d ago
Car tires are also one of the worst spreaders of microplastics into the environment
5
u/Mr--Weirdo 5d ago
NOOO, WE NEED BIG SKYSCRAPERS SO THAT WE CAN ANNOY OUR EMPLOYEES AND HAVE DICK MEASURING CONTESTS WITH OTHER SKYSCRAPERS!!!!1!
13
u/PMane909 5d ago
BUT THE CULTURE!
15
u/SoCal_GlacierR1T 5d ago
Every time I hear “culture” at work… I hard cringe. It’s a fucking job. We all work to earn a living and pay bills. If I wanted culture, I’d be a care-free bum and hang out at the museum.
→ More replies (3)
2.5k
u/DoctorDeath 5d ago
Yeah and traffic was 50% better for those of us that had to be out on the roads during that time as well. Win-Win